<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review of the AllianceBoots 2007/08 Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fabianpattberg.com/2008/10/review-of-the-allianceboots-200708-corporate-social-responsibility-csr-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fabianpattberg.com/2008/10/review-of-the-allianceboots-200708-corporate-social-responsibility-csr-report/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=review-of-the-allianceboots-200708-corporate-social-responsibility-csr-report</link>
	<description>A blog on Sustainability, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Social Media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:09:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CSRJohn</title>
		<link>http://www.fabianpattberg.com/2008/10/review-of-the-allianceboots-200708-corporate-social-responsibility-csr-report/comment-page-1/#comment-661</link>
		<dc:creator>CSRJohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fabianpattberg.com/?p=433#comment-661</guid>
		<description>Fabian

Nice summary of AllianceBoot&#039;s CSR report. I think that looking at a company&#039;s CSR report is an important exercise but isn&#039;t the only or primary consideration in assessing a company. I would characterize CSR reporting as &quot;policy&quot; and the company&#039;s actual behavior as &quot;practice.&quot; For instance, what is the company&#039;s record with respect to its workforce? Does it operate in countries that have a record of acceptable human rights? Have there been labor problems in any of the company&#039;s global locations? Problems with stakeholders?

Best

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fabian</p>
<p>Nice summary of AllianceBoot&#8217;s CSR report. I think that looking at a company&#8217;s CSR report is an important exercise but isn&#8217;t the only or primary consideration in assessing a company. I would characterize CSR reporting as &#8220;policy&#8221; and the company&#8217;s actual behavior as &#8220;practice.&#8221; For instance, what is the company&#8217;s record with respect to its workforce? Does it operate in countries that have a record of acceptable human rights? Have there been labor problems in any of the company&#8217;s global locations? Problems with stakeholders?</p>
<p>Best</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CSRJohn</title>
		<link>http://www.fabianpattberg.com/2008/10/review-of-the-allianceboots-200708-corporate-social-responsibility-csr-report/comment-page-1/#comment-2364</link>
		<dc:creator>CSRJohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fabianpattberg.com/?p=433#comment-2364</guid>
		<description>Fabian

Nice summary of AllianceBoot&#039;s CSR report. I think that looking at a company&#039;s CSR report is an important exercise but isn&#039;t the only or primary consideration in assessing a company. I would characterize CSR reporting as &quot;policy&quot; and the company&#039;s actual behavior as &quot;practice.&quot; For instance, what is the company&#039;s record with respect to its workforce? Does it operate in countries that have a record of acceptable human rights? Have there been labor problems in any of the company&#039;s global locations? Problems with stakeholders?

Best

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fabian</p>
<p>Nice summary of AllianceBoot&#8217;s CSR report. I think that looking at a company&#8217;s CSR report is an important exercise but isn&#8217;t the only or primary consideration in assessing a company. I would characterize CSR reporting as &#8220;policy&#8221; and the company&#8217;s actual behavior as &#8220;practice.&#8221; For instance, what is the company&#8217;s record with respect to its workforce? Does it operate in countries that have a record of acceptable human rights? Have there been labor problems in any of the company&#8217;s global locations? Problems with stakeholders?</p>
<p>Best</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabian</title>
		<link>http://www.fabianpattberg.com/2008/10/review-of-the-allianceboots-200708-corporate-social-responsibility-csr-report/comment-page-1/#comment-482</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 08:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fabianpattberg.com/?p=433#comment-482</guid>
		<description>Hello Elaine,
I think that the 4 sections structure is a thing of the past. Why? Well because these four sections are to rigid for properly display and communicate what the key issues, challenges and achievements of the particular company are. I believe that this structure could be beneficial for a company that is starting out in CSR reporting but AllianceBoots is not starting out. They have been reporting for many years now. I think they could have benefited from going away from that structure to a more company specific structure.
Do you agree?
Regards,
Fabian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Elaine,<br />
I think that the 4 sections structure is a thing of the past. Why? Well because these four sections are to rigid for properly display and communicate what the key issues, challenges and achievements of the particular company are. I believe that this structure could be beneficial for a company that is starting out in CSR reporting but AllianceBoots is not starting out. They have been reporting for many years now. I think they could have benefited from going away from that structure to a more company specific structure.<br />
Do you agree?<br />
Regards,<br />
Fabian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FabianPattberg</title>
		<link>http://www.fabianpattberg.com/2008/10/review-of-the-allianceboots-200708-corporate-social-responsibility-csr-report/comment-page-1/#comment-2363</link>
		<dc:creator>FabianPattberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 08:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fabianpattberg.com/?p=433#comment-2363</guid>
		<description>Hello Elaine,
I think that the 4 sections structure is a thing of the past. Why? Well because these four sections are to rigid for properly display and communicate what the key issues, challenges and achievements of the particular company are. I believe that this structure could be beneficial for a company that is starting out in CSR reporting but AllianceBoots is not starting out. They have been reporting for many years now. I think they could have benefited from going away from that structure to a more company specific structure.
Do you agree?
Regards,
Fabian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Elaine,<br />
I think that the 4 sections structure is a thing of the past. Why? Well because these four sections are to rigid for properly display and communicate what the key issues, challenges and achievements of the particular company are. I believe that this structure could be beneficial for a company that is starting out in CSR reporting but AllianceBoots is not starting out. They have been reporting for many years now. I think they could have benefited from going away from that structure to a more company specific structure.<br />
Do you agree?<br />
Regards,<br />
Fabian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elaine cohen - potential one - israel</title>
		<link>http://www.fabianpattberg.com/2008/10/review-of-the-allianceboots-200708-corporate-social-responsibility-csr-report/comment-page-1/#comment-481</link>
		<dc:creator>elaine cohen - potential one - israel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fabianpattberg.com/?p=433#comment-481</guid>
		<description>hi fabian, great summary. I havent looked at the report in depth yet, but i will take a look. I am interested to know why you dont think the 4 sections marketplace, workplace, community and environment is a reasonable  structure. You said : Best practice shows that this is not the ideal way of structuring a CSR report.
Whay is this not ideal and what do you consider to be best practice ?
thanks, elaine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi fabian, great summary. I havent looked at the report in depth yet, but i will take a look. I am interested to know why you dont think the 4 sections marketplace, workplace, community and environment is a reasonable  structure. You said : Best practice shows that this is not the ideal way of structuring a CSR report.<br />
Whay is this not ideal and what do you consider to be best practice ?<br />
thanks, elaine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elaine cohen - potential one -</title>
		<link>http://www.fabianpattberg.com/2008/10/review-of-the-allianceboots-200708-corporate-social-responsibility-csr-report/comment-page-1/#comment-2362</link>
		<dc:creator>elaine cohen - potential one -</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fabianpattberg.com/?p=433#comment-2362</guid>
		<description>hi fabian, great summary. I havent looked at the report in depth yet, but i will take a look. I am interested to know why you dont think the 4 sections marketplace, workplace, community and environment is a reasonable  structure. You said : Best practice shows that this is not the ideal way of structuring a CSR report.
Whay is this not ideal and what do you consider to be best practice ?
thanks, elaine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi fabian, great summary. I havent looked at the report in depth yet, but i will take a look. I am interested to know why you dont think the 4 sections marketplace, workplace, community and environment is a reasonable  structure. You said : Best practice shows that this is not the ideal way of structuring a CSR report.<br />
Whay is this not ideal and what do you consider to be best practice ?<br />
thanks, elaine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

